GAZETTE: The policy brief talks about the health impacts of wildfires. Maybe I just wasn’t paying attention when I was a kid in New England, but I don’t remember my throat getting scratchy because of wildfires in California and western Canada.

SALAS: The extreme heat, combined with the extended drought — which climate change has its fingerprints all over — triggered a record-breaking wildfire season in the western U.S. in 2020. It’s a trend that’s continued into 2021. And in July 2021, wildfire smoke from California’s massive Dixie fire reached as far east as Maine, impacting air quality across the East Coast. This contributed to New York City having its worst air quality in 15 years.

Evidence from 2020 showed that particulate matter, one of the many harmful components of wildfire smoke, was upwards of 14 times the current health-based limits of air quality in the vicinity of the wildfires and could still be four times that limit 600 miles away. This highlights that we are all interconnected in this crisis and that what is happening halfway across the country can have clear implications for health everywhere. I saw hazy skies when we had poor air quality because of those wildfires, and it was harming both me and my patients.

GAZETTE: Is there evidence that the smoke may get more toxic on the way across the country?

SALAS: There is emerging science that the particulate matter from wildfires may be 10 times more harmful than particulate matter in air pollution from other sources. In addition, it seems that the health harms from wildfire smoke may be worse farther away from the fire. Scientists think that could be because of a process called oxidation, which is a chemical reaction that happens as wildfire smoke is in the air longer. There are other factors as well, like perhaps people not recognizing the health-harming dangers of this air pollution and so not protecting themselves. This is one of many critical areas that we need to understand better so we can best protect health, especially for those most vulnerable.

GAZETTE: During those smoke episodes, did you see any change in the emergency room at MGH?

SALAS: The health harms can range from the subtle — like a transient cough and mild sore throats, like you experienced — to the really severe, like worsening of lung diseases, higher risks of preterm birth, and death. So, it has clear implications for health, the conditions I will treat, and even the number of patients I’m going to see in the emergency department.

GAZETTE: The brief talks about Dengue fever, a disease I think most Americans aren’t familiar with. What is Dengue fever and why might it become a bigger hazard?

SALAS: Dengue is a disease transmitted by mosquitoes, which is worsening around the world, in part because of climate change. It is altering temperature, rainfall, and humidity, making the environment increasingly suitable for Dengue to spread through mosquitoes. Our new data shows that the transmission potential for Dengue in the U.S. is rising. This transmission potential was on average over 50 percent higher in the past five years compared to the 1950s. It briefly rose above one for the first time in the U.S. in 2017. A transmission potential above one, as we’ve become more familiar with during the COVID-19 pandemic, could potentially lead to an outbreak on U.S. soil under the right conditions. This really highlights the importance of research on future health threats, so we can prepare.

GAZETTE: They call Dengue break-bone fever because of the bone and muscle pain it brings. Is it really that unpleasant to get?

SALAS: Yes, the symptoms can range from the mild — essentially a flu-like illness — to causing severe illness and death, especially if you get the disease a second time.

Renee Salas.

Renee Salas discusses The Lancet's annual report on climate and health during a virtual press conference.

Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard Staff Photographer

GAZETTE: Let’s talk about the report itself. Is it aimed at the general public or U.S. policymakers or the folks who are going to this climate meeting in Glasgow, COP26?

SALAS: The Lancet Countdown is timed right before COP intentionally because we want to make sure that conversations there are informed by the latest science on how climate change is harming health and the benefits of action on climate change for both health and equity. We intend this wealth of science to be useful to many individuals. First and foremost, we want to make sure it informs decision-making, but we also want to inform both the public-health and medical communities so that they understand the harms their communities and patients are seeing. And we want to use it as an opportunity for the general public to further understand why climate change is personal. It is a health crisis today, and health and equity need to be not only the reason that we act — but be our guiding principle for how we respond.

GAZETTE: Let’s talk about equity and responding to the climate crisis. That’s clearly an important issue.

SALAS: There is a growing recognition that decades-long, racially biased policies have created health inequities and made certain populations more vulnerable. That includes but is not limited to Black, Latinx, Alaskan Natives, American Indians, Asian American, and Pacific Islander communities and other people of color. Policies have also negatively impacted low-income and rural communities. These are populations that are disproportionately exposed to the health harms of burning fossil fuels, both from climate change and air pollution. For extreme heat, historic redlined areas can be substantially hotter than other city neighborhoods. Indigenous communities can disproportionately bear the brunt of droughts. There are certain communities of color that are disproportionately at higher risk from wildfires due to a variety of factors, including discriminatory housing policies. We have a profound opportunity to use policy to improve health and accelerate action toward true health equity.

GAZETTE: Do you share the view that climate change is in the end a health problem?

SALAS: This is the main message that we want people to come away with from this year’s report. Climate change is first and foremost a health crisis. Bold, ambitious commitments at COP26 will be the greatest prescription for improving health and equity that the world can write.

GAZETTE: Was there some specific event that pulled you into the fight?

SALAS: In 2013, when I read the Lancet report, my rose-colored glasses were knocked off. I clearly saw how climate change was going to be the greatest health threat of our time. And I knew that I had to redirect my career and make that a focus. I’ve been blessed to be able to have the opportunity to do that and help advance the work, collectively, with so many amazing colleagues around the country and globe. We are all in this together and that is how we will tackle it: together.

Related

More climate research, teaching to make greater impact

Vice Provost for Climate and Sustainability James Stock looks ahead

Climate scientist on UN report: Just as bad as we expected

Peter Huybers of SEAS says global response should include satellites, alternative-fuels research, and a commitment to food security, education

What exactly is a ‘fire tornado’?

Researcher Loretta Mickley discusses climate change, effects of forest management, and the rise and future of massive wildfires in West